Carries Category 1 information for which no more specific message type is defined. It has been widely used for payment queries and explanations, but structured cancellation and investigation messages are preferred because free text is difficult to automate.
DIRECTION: Sent between financial institutions, or in supported corporate arrangements, when information about a Category 1 payment cannot be expressed in a more specific MT.
Version + profile: MT199 follows the applicable Standards MT release and service rules. This page is a curated field subset; bilateral practice and annual standards changes can alter permitted content and handling.
DOMAIN + EDITORIAL AUDITAudited 2026-07-18 for payment logic, source scope, technical writing, and Payments Signal voice — see the method.
EVIDENCE AT ARM'S REACH
IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCES
Start with the exact message version, then apply the scheme or network profile that governs your implementation.
An XSD checks XML structure. A usage guideline adds profile rules, conditional fields, code restrictions, and business controls. XSD-valid does not mean scheme-compliant.
Usage guidelineSwift MTcurrent
Swift Standards MT release material
The annual MT standard and release information. Full field specifications may require an authenticated Swift account.
Owner
Swift
Checked
2026-07-18
Access
Login required · Swift login and the organisation's permissions may be required.
A fictional free-format payment investigation used only where no more specific structured message fits. SYNTHETIC / TRAINING ONLY; illustrative unvalidated.
Owner
Payments Signal
Checked
2026-07-19
Integrity
crc32:6379a2cf
Access
Payments Signal download · Original fictional teaching sample; no login required.
Field correspondence, transformation treatment, and data-loss notes for Free-format category-1 answer compared with a structured investigation response.
Owner
Payments Signal
Checked
2026-07-19
Integrity
crc32:f2fa44ac
Access
Payments Signal download · Original, source-backed teaching asset; no login required.
Message senderProvides clear references and narrative without using free format to bypass a structured message.
Message receiverRoutes the narrative, locates the related payment, and responds through the agreed case process.
KEY FIELDS
Curated teaching subset. MT199 intentionally has little structure; the official handbook and applicable market-practice guidance govern references, authentication, and any coded narrative conventions.
Key fields of MT199
FIELD
NAME
PRESENCE
WHAT IT MEANS
:20:
Transaction reference
MANDATORY
Unique reference for this free-format message or case.
:21:
Related reference
MANDATORY
Reference of the payment or request being discussed.
:79:
Narrative
MANDATORY
Free-format information, ideally following agreed coded conventions.
:79:/RFI/
Request-for-information marker
OPTIONAL
Agreed narrative marker showing the business purpose of the message.
:79::121:
Quoted UETR
OPTIONAL
UETR copied into the narrative when needed for payment correlation.
Block 3 / field 121
Message UETR
CONDITIONAL
Network reference for the free-format message where the service requires it.
COMMON ERRORS
Using MT199 where MT192, MT195, or MT196 already fits.Consequence: A structured, automatable process becomes a manual narrative case.Avoid it: Choose the specific message first and reserve MT199 for genuinely unsupported information.
Writing narrative without related reference or UETR.Consequence: The receiver cannot identify the payment and must ask a second question.Avoid it: Lead with the case, payment reference, UETR, and a precise requested action.
USAGE CONTEXTS
Legacy free-format investigationBanks have used MT199 for requests and answers when no dedicated message or automation was in place.
Migration and residual usePayment E&I is moving to camt.110/111, while some non-E&I MT199 purposes are moving to other ISO 20022 correspondence messages on separate timelines.
Defines the MT message standards (including MT101, MT103, MT202/202 COV, and the MT9xx statement messages) exchanged over the Swift FIN network, maintained through annual standards releases. · Checked 2026-07-18
Full field-level specifications live in the Swift Knowledge Centre User Handbook behind a swift.com login. Coexistence for in-scope FI-to-FI payment instructions ended on 22 November 2025, but treatment differs by MT: some instructions are NAKed and selected messages can enter temporary, chargeable contingency conversion. Reporting, initiation, investigations and correspondence follow separate roadmaps.
Describes current CBPR+ adoption, the 22 November 2025 end of coexistence for in-scope FI-to-FI payment instructions, later migration work and the November 2026 structured-address milestone. · Checked 2026-07-18
Do not generalise the payment-instruction deadline to every FIN message. Swift publishes differentiated NAK, contingency-conversion, reporting, initiation and exceptions-and-investigations treatment.
Simplified educational illustration
Payments Signal editorial teaching models — Payments Signal
This site's own simplified teaching models. · Checked 2026-07-12
What this simplifies: One request-for-information narrative is shown; bilateral conventions vary.
Used wherever diagrams, scenarios, figures, or example values are didactic constructions rather than sourced facts; every such use carries a simplifications disclosure. All people, companies, banks, and list entries in examples are fictional.
COMMUNITY SIGNAL
Discuss this learning page
Share an operational observation or ask a concrete payments question. Your name and message are public; your email remains private.
NEXT QUESTION REVIEWMonday, 27 Jul, 8:00 amMonday answer runs use source-supported educational material. Some questions may need owner review.