GLOBAL PAYMENTS KNOWLEDGEISO 20022 / SWIFT / SEPA / MT / MX
MT195SWIFT MT

MT195 — Queries

Requests information about, or an amendment to, a previous Category 1 message. It is the structured legacy query message; recurring payment investigations are migrating toward camt.110 through Swift Case Management.

DIRECTION: Sent by a financial institution to the counterparty expected to answer a query about a previous Category 1 message.

Version + profile: MT195 follows the applicable Standards MT release and service rules. This page is a curated field subset; bilateral practice and annual standards changes can alter permitted content and handling.

EVIDENCE AT ARM'S REACH

IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCES

Start with the exact message version, then apply the scheme or network profile that governs your implementation.

An XSD checks XML structure. A usage guideline adds profile rules, conditional fields, code restrictions, and business controls. XSD-valid does not mean scheme-compliant.

Usage guidelineSwift MTcurrent

Swift Standards MT release material

The annual MT standard and release information. Full field specifications may require an authenticated Swift account.

Owner
Swift
Checked
2026-07-18
Access
Login required · Swift login and the organisation's permissions may be required.
OPEN OFFICIAL SOURCE
Teaching sampleScheme-neutral teachingcurrent

MT195 payment query — raw FIN

A fictional structured query about a previous MT103. SYNTHETIC / TRAINING ONLY; illustrative unvalidated.

Owner
Payments Signal
Checked
2026-07-19
Integrity
crc32:426d155e
Access
Payments Signal download · Original fictional teaching sample; no login required.
DOWNLOAD
Lifecycle packScheme-neutral teachingcurrent

MT legacy and migration lifecycle — ZIP pack

Initiation, serial and cover context, cancellation and correspondence, advices, and statements.

Owner
Payments Signal
Checked
2026-07-19
Integrity
crc32:8b3a20e4
Access
Payments Signal download · Original fictional teaching pack; no login required.
DOWNLOAD
MappingCBPR+current

MT195 → camt.110 implementation mapping

Field correspondence, transformation treatment, and data-loss notes for Legacy payment query compared with a structured investigation request.

Owner
Payments Signal
Checked
2026-07-19
Integrity
crc32:cf0328ed
Access
Payments Signal download · Original, source-backed teaching asset; no login required.
DOWNLOAD
Field matrixBase ISO 20022current

MT195 field matrix

Curated field requirements, contexts, operational meaning, and implementation cautions.

Owner
Payments Signal
Checked
2026-07-19
Integrity
crc32:793b29f1
Access
Payments Signal download · Original, source-backed teaching asset; no login required.
DOWNLOAD

WHO IS INVOLVED

  • Query senderIdentifies the original message and asks a specific coded question.
  • Query receiverInvestigates and replies with MT196 or the applicable agreed response.

KEY FIELDS

Curated teaching subset. The official Standards MT handbook and market-practice guidance define complete query codes, repetition rules, and response conventions.

Key fields of MT195
FIELDNAMEPRESENCEWHAT IT MEANS
:20:Query referenceMANDATORYUnique case reference for this query.
:21:Related referenceMANDATORYReference of the original message being queried.
:75:QueriesMANDATORYCoded question and any requested field clarification.
:77A:NarrativeOPTIONALAdditional information needed to explain the query.
Block 3 / field 121UETRCONDITIONALReference used to locate the original payment across the chain.
:11S:Original message detailsCONDITIONALMessage type and date of the transaction being queried.

COMMON ERRORS

  • Using a vague narrative instead of the available query code.Consequence: The receiver cannot route or automate the request and an analyst must interpret it manually.Avoid it: Use the standard query number and identify the field or evidence requested.
  • Omitting the original UETR or related reference.Consequence: The receiving bank cannot reliably locate the payment.Avoid it: Populate the case from the stored original message, not from a manually retyped customer complaint.

USAGE CONTEXTS

  • Payment investigationUsed for structured questions about a prior MT103, including missing or unclear party and regulatory information.
  • E&I migrationSwift Case Management uses camt.110/111 for structured investigations, with dated reachability and retirement milestones for MT investigation use.

SEE IT IN A PLAYABLE FLOW

Sources for this reference3
  1. Official requirement

    Swift Standards MT (annual standards releases)Swift · Category 1 — MT195 Queries

    Defines the MT message standards (including MT101, MT103, MT202/202 COV, and the MT9xx statement messages) exchanged over the Swift FIN network, maintained through annual standards releases. · Checked 2026-07-18

    Full field-level specifications live in the Swift Knowledge Centre User Handbook behind a swift.com login. Coexistence for in-scope FI-to-FI payment instructions ended on 22 November 2025, but treatment differs by MT: some instructions are NAKed and selected messages can enter temporary, chargeable contingency conversion. Reporting, initiation, investigations and correspondence follow separate roadmaps.

  2. Scheme-specific rule

    ISO 20022 Standards (Swift ISO 20022 adoption programme)Swift · Exceptions and Investigations transformation

    Describes current CBPR+ adoption, the 22 November 2025 end of coexistence for in-scope FI-to-FI payment instructions, later migration work and the November 2026 structured-address milestone. · Checked 2026-07-18

    Do not generalise the payment-instruction deadline to every FIN message. Swift publishes differentiated NAK, contingency-conversion, reporting, initiation and exceptions-and-investigations treatment.

  3. Simplified educational illustration

    Payments Signal editorial teaching modelsPayments Signal

    This site's own simplified teaching models. · Checked 2026-07-12

    What this simplifies: One regulatory-information query is shown from a larger code set.

    Used wherever diagrams, scenarios, figures, or example values are didactic constructions rather than sourced facts; every such use carries a simplifications disclosure. All people, companies, banks, and list entries in examples are fictional.

COMMUNITY SIGNAL

Discuss this learning page

Share an operational observation or ask a concrete payments question. Your name and message are public; your email remains private.

NEXT QUESTION REVIEWMonday, 27 Jul, 8:00 amMonday answer runs use source-supported educational material. Some questions may need owner review.
WHAT ARE YOU SHARING?

Public discussion

LOADING

Loading the discussion…