Requests information about, or an amendment to, a previous Category 1 message. It is the structured legacy query message; recurring payment investigations are migrating toward camt.110 through Swift Case Management.
DIRECTION: Sent by a financial institution to the counterparty expected to answer a query about a previous Category 1 message.
Version + profile: MT195 follows the applicable Standards MT release and service rules. This page is a curated field subset; bilateral practice and annual standards changes can alter permitted content and handling.
DOMAIN + EDITORIAL AUDITAudited 2026-07-18 for payment logic, source scope, technical writing, and Payments Signal voice — see the method.
EVIDENCE AT ARM'S REACH
IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCES
Start with the exact message version, then apply the scheme or network profile that governs your implementation.
An XSD checks XML structure. A usage guideline adds profile rules, conditional fields, code restrictions, and business controls. XSD-valid does not mean scheme-compliant.
Usage guidelineSwift MTcurrent
Swift Standards MT release material
The annual MT standard and release information. Full field specifications may require an authenticated Swift account.
Owner
Swift
Checked
2026-07-18
Access
Login required · Swift login and the organisation's permissions may be required.
Query senderIdentifies the original message and asks a specific coded question.
Query receiverInvestigates and replies with MT196 or the applicable agreed response.
KEY FIELDS
Curated teaching subset. The official Standards MT handbook and market-practice guidance define complete query codes, repetition rules, and response conventions.
Key fields of MT195
FIELD
NAME
PRESENCE
WHAT IT MEANS
:20:
Query reference
MANDATORY
Unique case reference for this query.
:21:
Related reference
MANDATORY
Reference of the original message being queried.
:75:
Queries
MANDATORY
Coded question and any requested field clarification.
:77A:
Narrative
OPTIONAL
Additional information needed to explain the query.
Block 3 / field 121
UETR
CONDITIONAL
Reference used to locate the original payment across the chain.
:11S:
Original message details
CONDITIONAL
Message type and date of the transaction being queried.
COMMON ERRORS
Using a vague narrative instead of the available query code.Consequence: The receiver cannot route or automate the request and an analyst must interpret it manually.Avoid it: Use the standard query number and identify the field or evidence requested.
Omitting the original UETR or related reference.Consequence: The receiving bank cannot reliably locate the payment.Avoid it: Populate the case from the stored original message, not from a manually retyped customer complaint.
USAGE CONTEXTS
Payment investigationUsed for structured questions about a prior MT103, including missing or unclear party and regulatory information.
E&I migrationSwift Case Management uses camt.110/111 for structured investigations, with dated reachability and retirement milestones for MT investigation use.
Defines the MT message standards (including MT101, MT103, MT202/202 COV, and the MT9xx statement messages) exchanged over the Swift FIN network, maintained through annual standards releases. · Checked 2026-07-18
Full field-level specifications live in the Swift Knowledge Centre User Handbook behind a swift.com login. Coexistence for in-scope FI-to-FI payment instructions ended on 22 November 2025, but treatment differs by MT: some instructions are NAKed and selected messages can enter temporary, chargeable contingency conversion. Reporting, initiation, investigations and correspondence follow separate roadmaps.
Describes current CBPR+ adoption, the 22 November 2025 end of coexistence for in-scope FI-to-FI payment instructions, later migration work and the November 2026 structured-address milestone. · Checked 2026-07-18
Do not generalise the payment-instruction deadline to every FIN message. Swift publishes differentiated NAK, contingency-conversion, reporting, initiation and exceptions-and-investigations treatment.
Simplified educational illustration
Payments Signal editorial teaching models — Payments Signal
This site's own simplified teaching models. · Checked 2026-07-12
What this simplifies: One regulatory-information query is shown from a larger code set.
Used wherever diagrams, scenarios, figures, or example values are didactic constructions rather than sourced facts; every such use carries a simplifications disclosure. All people, companies, banks, and list entries in examples are fictional.
COMMUNITY SIGNAL
Discuss this learning page
Share an operational observation or ask a concrete payments question. Your name and message are public; your email remains private.
NEXT QUESTION REVIEWMonday, 27 Jul, 8:00 amMonday answer runs use source-supported educational material. Some questions may need owner review.