Wrong account number abroad: a returned MT103
Trigger: Cassia Bank cannot apply the credit — the beneficiary account number in the MT103 does not exist on its books.
What operations sees first: Days after the outbound payment, an unexpected inbound MT103 with /RETN/ in field 72 arrives, and the nostro shows the money coming back — sometimes less correspondent charges.
WHERE IS THE MONEY?
Debited from the customer at the start; in transit across correspondent accounts for the round trip; back with the customer after the return, possibly net of charges.
DID SETTLEMENT HAPPEN?
Each leg settled across correspondent accounts as it happened, and the return settled the same way in the opposite direction. Nothing was reversed — value moved twice.
WHO ACTS NEXT?
Cassia Bank (beneficiary bank) Bank Alfa asks the customer to confirm the beneficiary's account number and weighs pre-validation checks for that corridor to catch bad account data before sending.
PLAY THE EXCEPTION
Trigger: The beneficiary account number in the MT103 does not exist at Cassia.
The customer orders a USD transfer abroad
Ordering customer → Bank Alfa (ordering bank)
The ordering customer instructs Bank Alfa to pay a supplier banked at Cassia Bank in another country. Bank Alfa has no direct account relationship with Cassia — that is why correspondents exist.
Step 1 of 13: The customer orders a USD transfer abroad
- 02ProcessingBank Alfa validates and screensBank Alfa (ordering bank)
- 03PostingThe customer's account is debitedBank Alfa (ordering bank)
- 05ProcessingMeridian validates and screens in the middleMeridian Bank (correspondent)
- 06SettlementMoney moves across the books of MeridianMeridian Bank (correspondent)
- 09ProcessingCassia validates the incoming paymentCassia Bank (beneficiary bank)
- 10 · EXCEPTION PATHProcessingCassia cannot apply the fundsCassia Bank (beneficiary bank)
- 12 · EXCEPTION PATHSettlementMeridian books the money backMeridian Bank (correspondent)
- 13 · EXCEPTION PATHPostingThe ordering customer is re-creditedBank Alfa (ordering bank)
- OUTCOME
- Funds
- Back with the ordering customer (charges may have been deducted along the way).
- Settlement
- Each hop settled and was then unwound by an equally settled return.
- Who acts next
- Cassia Bank (beneficiary bank) — The customer verifies the beneficiary's account number before re-sending.
Full step-by-step text (works without JavaScript)
- 02ProcessingBank Alfa validates and screensBank Alfa (ordering bank)
Format and balance checks plus sanctions screening. Cross-border payments face stricter screening because more jurisdictions are involved.
Screening checkpoint: Outbound cross-border screening — Ordering and beneficiary parties, banks, and remittance text are screened before the payment leaves.
- 03PostingThe customer's account is debitedBank Alfa (ordering bank)
Bank Alfa books the debit and, per the charge option, any fees.
- DR Ordering customer's account at Bank Alfa — USD 250,000.00
- 05ProcessingMeridian validates and screens in the middleMeridian Bank (correspondent)
Every bank in the chain screens independently. Meridian also checks that Bank Alfa's account has cover for the debit.
- 06SettlementMoney moves across the books of MeridianMeridian Bank (correspondent)
Both Bank Alfa and Cassia hold USD accounts at Meridian. Settlement here is a book transfer in commercial bank money: Meridian debits one account it holds and credits the other.
No clearing house is involved — the correspondent's ledger is the settlement venue. This is settlement in commercial bank money, not central bank money.
- DR Bank Alfa's USD account at Meridian (vostro) — USD 250,000.00
- CR Cassia's USD account at Meridian (vostro) — USD 250,000.00
- 09ProcessingCassia validates the incoming paymentCassia Bank (beneficiary bank)
Account checks and inbound screening. Only when funds are confirmed on the nostro and checks pass is the beneficiary credited.
- 10 · EXCEPTION PATHProcessingCassia cannot apply the fundsCassia Bank (beneficiary bank)
The account number fails validation. The nostro money has already arrived, so it must travel back the way it came.
- 12 · EXCEPTION PATHSettlementMeridian books the money backMeridian Bank (correspondent)
The return settles the same way the original did — across the vostro accounts.
- DR Cassia's USD account at Meridian (vostro) — USD 250,000.00
- CR Bank Alfa's USD account at Meridian (vostro) — USD 250,000.00
- 13 · EXCEPTION PATHPostingThe ordering customer is re-creditedBank Alfa (ordering bank)
Bank Alfa credits the customer back, possibly minus deducted charges depending on the charge option, and tells them why the payment failed.
- CR Ordering customer's account at Bank Alfa — USD 250,000.00
- OUTCOME
- Funds
- Back with the ordering customer (charges may have been deducted along the way).
- Settlement
- Each hop settled and was then unwound by an equally settled return.
- Who acts next
- Cassia Bank (beneficiary bank) — The customer verifies the beneficiary's account number before re-sending.
THE TIMELINE
- 01Ordering customerInstructs a cross-border USD payment; Bank Alfa debits the customer's account.
- 02Bank AlfaSends the MT103 serially to its USD correspondent, Meridian Bank.MT103
- 03Meridian BankBooks the transfer across the accounts it holds and forwards the MT103 to Cassia Bank.MT103
- 04Cassia BankValidation fails — the beneficiary account number does not exist.
In the MT world there is no scheme-defined return message: funds travel back as a new MT103, flagged as a return by convention.
- 05Cassia BankReturns the funds via the correspondent chain with /RETN/ in field 72, referencing the original payment so the receiver can match it.MT103
- 06Meridian BankConfirms the credit of the returned funds to Bank Alfa's nostro account.MT910
- 07Bank AlfaMatches the return to the outgoing payment and re-credits the customer — possibly reduced by correspondent charges.
Resolution: The money comes back as a fresh, settled payment flagged as a return under the SWIFT reject/return convention. Matching depends on references and the /RETN/ codeword in field 72 — there is no scheme guarantee of speed, and charges may be deducted along the way.
Sources for this scenario2
- Official requirement
Swift Standards MT (annual standards releases) ↗ — Swift · field 72 reject/return conventions
Full field-level specifications live in the Swift Knowledge Centre User Handbook behind a swift.com login; content here relies on public summaries. Swift ended MT-to-ISO 20022 coexistence for in-scope cross-border payment instructions (for example MT103 and MT202) in November 2025; MT statement messages are being phased out on a separate timeline.
- Simplified educational illustration
Payments Signal editorial teaching models — Payments Signal
What this simplifies: Single-correspondent chain; institution-specific handling varies.
Used wherever diagrams, scenarios, figures, or example values are didactic constructions rather than sourced facts; every such use carries a simplifications disclosure. All people, companies, banks, and list entries in examples are fictional.